How does strict liability function in tort law?

Strict liability in tort law operates on the principle that a party can be held responsible for harm caused by their actions or products, regardless of whether there was any negligence or intent to cause harm. This legal framework is particularly relevant in cases involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products, where the law prioritizes the safety of individuals over the excuses of the entities involved.

The characteristic that distinguishes strict liability is the absence of the need to prove fault. Unlike negligence, where the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant failed to meet a certain standard of care, strict liability allows the injured party to recover damages simply by showing that the harmful occurrence happened and that the defendant was involved. For example, if a manufacturer sells a defective product that injures a consumer, the consumer can hold the manufacturer liable under strict liability, even if the manufacturer acted carefully and took all reasonable precautions.

This approach encourages organizations to maintain high safety standards and take responsibility for their products and practices, thereby providing a strong incentive to prevent harm.