What are common defenses in tort law relevant to operational law?

In tort law, common defenses can significantly impact the outcome of a case by potentially absolving the defendant of liability. The selection that identifies contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statutory defenses encompasses crucial principles that are often employed in operational law.

Contributory negligence refers to a situation where the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the harm they suffered. If it can be demonstrated that the plaintiff acted in a way that put them at risk, this may limit or eliminate their ability to recover damages from the defendant.

Assumption of risk involves a situation in which a plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily engages in an activity that has inherent risks. If a plaintiff is aware of the risks associated with their actions and still proceeds, they may be prevented from claiming damages.

Statutory defenses relate to certain legislative protections that can shield a defendant from liability under specific circumstances defined by law. These can include compliance with safety regulations or laws that dictate certain standards of care.

The combination of these three defenses is frequently used in operational law scenarios, making this option particularly relevant and accurate. Other choices may include concepts relevant to tort law but do not capture as comprehensive a range of defenses as this answer does.