What can be a basis for the suppression of evidence?

The basis for the suppression of evidence often revolves around issues of fairness, legality, and the protection of individual rights. Live testimony can be subject to suppression if it was obtained through means that violate a defendant's constitutional rights, such as through coercion, intimidation, or failure to provide legal representation during questioning.

For instance, if a witness provides live testimony that was influenced by illegal interrogation techniques, such as a violation of Miranda rights or prosecutorial misconduct, this testimony can be deemed inadmissible in court. The rationale is that the integrity of the judicial process relies heavily on the credibility of evidence. Allowing testimony that was obtained unlawfully undermines the fairness of a trial and can have significant implications on the outcome of a case.

Other types of evidence, such as documentary or digital evidence, can also be subject to suppression but commonly hinge on different legal standards or contexts, such as breach of privacy laws or mishandling of evidence. However, the inherent nature of live testimony being directly connected to a witness's immediate experiences makes it particularly vulnerable to suppression based on procedural violations surrounding its acquisition. This is why live testimony stands out as a key basis for the potential suppression of evidence.