What must occur for a government seizure to be considered meaningful?

For a government seizure to be considered meaningful, it must interfere with possessory rights or interests. This means that the action taken by the government must disrupt an individual's or entity's lawful right to possess or use property.

Possessory rights are fundamental to property law and indicate the legal authority someone has over a specific piece of property. When the government engages in a seizure that impacts these rights, it is significant enough to warrant legal scrutiny and possible recourse under the law.

For example, if the government confiscates property without due process, this directly affects the owner's ability to possess and control their property, thus constituting a meaningful seizure. The other options present considerations that may relate to the broader context of legal proceedings or property law, but they do not capture the essence of what makes a seizure itself impactful in a legal sense. Therefore, specifically focusing on the interference with possessory rights is crucial in establishing the meaningfulness of a government seizure.